Jump to content

Talk:Least squares

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Justifying derivation of general solution for linear least squares

[edit]

I think the notation here is a little confusing, because makes it seem like it could be a matrix, when in fact it has to be a vector:

I'd consider replacing with . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fadmmatt (talkcontribs) 17:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, this equation seems incorrect about the beta 77.147.1.34 (talk) 22:31, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


complex application

[edit]

Would it be worthwhile to mention how the formula needs modification for complex values? We don't want the squared error to be negative. (When I used it, I had to work this out from first principles.) One could simply make the formula more general by adding conjugation bars where appropriate, and explain that this is redundant when all values are real. —Tamfang (talk) 05:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OVERLY COMPLICATED

[edit]

This is another entry presenting data in an overly-complex way. See this Investopedia article on the same topic for an easy-to-read summary of the same topic: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/least-squares.asp

Please consider revising this article for clarity and ease of comprehension. AliasSeaThinker (talk) 21:18, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]